Although his best years did not quite reach Ruthian levels, the decade of the 1930s would once again belong to a Bronx bomber. This time, Lou Gehrig, with a big push from Jimmie Foxx, would take five spots on the Top Ten List of the best seasons by a position player in the 1930s. With 49 HR, 165 RBI, and a 0.363 batting average in 1934, Gehrig would jump to the top of the list at 50.136 PEVA.
D/ARank Player ID Name First Year Team Lg HR RBI AVG Age PEVA-B
1 13 gehrilo01 Gehrig Lou 1934 NYA AL 49 165 0.363 31 50.136
2 20 gehrilo01 Gehrig Lou 1936 NYA AL 49 152 0.354 33 45.995
3 36 foxxji01 Foxx Jimmie 1933 PHA AL 48 163 0.356 26 42.539
4 43 ruthba01 Ruth Babe 1931 NYA AL 46 163 0.373 36 41.968
5 51 foxxji01 Foxx Jimmie 1932 PHA AL 58 169 0.364 25 41.252
6 62 gehrilo01 Gehrig Lou 1931 NYA AL 46 184 0.341 28 40.131
7 65 gehrilo01 Gehrig Lou 1930 NYA AL 41 174 0.379 27 39.839
8 70 ruthba01 Ruth Babe 1930 NYA AL 49 153 0.359 35 39.019
9 84 gehrilo01 Gehrig Lou 1937 NYA AL 37 159 0.351 34 37.760
10 88 foxxji01 Foxx Jimmie 1938 BOS AL 50 175 0.349 31 37.579
Showing posts with label best batting years. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best batting years. Show all posts
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Top Ten Years Position Players - 1870s
Stat Geek Baseball presents the Top Ten of the Decade blog series. This blog is the 1st in our series of Top Ten Position Player Lists, first starting with the best of the 1870s. A new article will appear every two days through the end of May, counting down each decade from 1870 through the present day. Stop back and find out who the best players were in the decade of your choice, where they ranked overall in the history of baseball, and how the decade ranked as well.
First, we'll start out with an explanation of the PEVA player rating system. First off, it's complicated, and based on what types of production, plus fielding, produce how players have been paid since 1995. The PEVA system is based from 0 (actually 0.200) to 64.000. No player, over an entire season, has ever reached the maximum 64.000 level. It's hard, although not impossible to do. How would a player reach that level? He would have to rank at the top of the year's stats in three PEVA categories (Games, Plate Appearances, Runs + RBI) and play in a home park with a Park Factor even or below average Park Factor over the last three years. He would have to have a Slugging Percentage and On Base Percentage that dominated the year, and a Fielding Value (when modified by that dominance) would rank at the top of the year's stats as well.
But when you say dominance, what do you mean? The entire PEVA system is based on maximum and average yearly values and how a player rates below and above that level, then modified for park factor. So in those six categories mentioned, as far as a position player goes, (Games, Plate Appearances, Runs+RBI, Slugging Percentage, On Base Percentage, Field Value), the more dominant a player is between the average and the maximum, the higher his PEVA Rating Score. It is not, however, a purely 1:1 relationship, as certain value are modified based on how other factors dominant. Sorry, but it is complicated, (5,000 hours worth) but in the end produces a PEVA value that correlates to salary. And it does not matter what the era of the player was; PEVA is valid in a comparative basis from one era to the next.
PEVA Scoreboard
Above 32.000 - Fantastic, MVP candidate
Above 20.000 - All League Player
Above 15.0000 - All Star Player
Above 10.000 - Very Good Player
3.500 - Average Player
Now past the boring part, and on to the lists.
Best Batting Years of the 1870s
Not household names today, and often not highly regarded in the Hall of Fame discussions due to a low amount of games played and counting stats during the seasons of the decade, the decade of the 1870s produced 12 players with a PEVA score about 32.000 and player that should get a lot of credit for the years they produced. Folks, Ross Barnes, Deacon White, and Paul Hines should be in the Hall of Fame. It's not their fault they didn't play 162 game seasons and with a ball that could soar out of small ballparks.
What position player had the best year of the 1870s. Orator Shaffer played for the Indianapolis Blues in 1878, in a park so hard to hit in, South Street Park, that it's Park Factor was 87. Kinda like playing in Petco Park today. In a year when the maximum number of games played was 63, the most HRs hit was 4 and the total amount of homers was 23 for the entire league. Orator Shaffer did not hit a Home Run in 1878, but he dominated the year in other categories, ... he played the most games, 63, had an OBP and SLG percentages that when adjusted for playing in the tough hitting park, placed him above the Max Dominant Factor for those categories, and was one of the best fielding outfielders in baseball, with good range and a good arm. All in all, Orator Shaffer had the best year of all position players in the 1870s, at 50.240 PEVA rating score, which ranks #12 overall in baseball history. And all this for a player with 0 home runs.
First, we'll start out with an explanation of the PEVA player rating system. First off, it's complicated, and based on what types of production, plus fielding, produce how players have been paid since 1995. The PEVA system is based from 0 (actually 0.200) to 64.000. No player, over an entire season, has ever reached the maximum 64.000 level. It's hard, although not impossible to do. How would a player reach that level? He would have to rank at the top of the year's stats in three PEVA categories (Games, Plate Appearances, Runs + RBI) and play in a home park with a Park Factor even or below average Park Factor over the last three years. He would have to have a Slugging Percentage and On Base Percentage that dominated the year, and a Fielding Value (when modified by that dominance) would rank at the top of the year's stats as well.
But when you say dominance, what do you mean? The entire PEVA system is based on maximum and average yearly values and how a player rates below and above that level, then modified for park factor. So in those six categories mentioned, as far as a position player goes, (Games, Plate Appearances, Runs+RBI, Slugging Percentage, On Base Percentage, Field Value), the more dominant a player is between the average and the maximum, the higher his PEVA Rating Score. It is not, however, a purely 1:1 relationship, as certain value are modified based on how other factors dominant. Sorry, but it is complicated, (5,000 hours worth) but in the end produces a PEVA value that correlates to salary. And it does not matter what the era of the player was; PEVA is valid in a comparative basis from one era to the next.
PEVA Scoreboard
Above 32.000 - Fantastic, MVP candidate
Above 20.000 - All League Player
Above 15.0000 - All Star Player
Above 10.000 - Very Good Player
3.500 - Average Player
Now past the boring part, and on to the lists.
Best Batting Years of the 1870s
Not household names today, and often not highly regarded in the Hall of Fame discussions due to a low amount of games played and counting stats during the seasons of the decade, the decade of the 1870s produced 12 players with a PEVA score about 32.000 and player that should get a lot of credit for the years they produced. Folks, Ross Barnes, Deacon White, and Paul Hines should be in the Hall of Fame. It's not their fault they didn't play 162 game seasons and with a ball that could soar out of small ballparks.
What position player had the best year of the 1870s. Orator Shaffer played for the Indianapolis Blues in 1878, in a park so hard to hit in, South Street Park, that it's Park Factor was 87. Kinda like playing in Petco Park today. In a year when the maximum number of games played was 63, the most HRs hit was 4 and the total amount of homers was 23 for the entire league. Orator Shaffer did not hit a Home Run in 1878, but he dominated the year in other categories, ... he played the most games, 63, had an OBP and SLG percentages that when adjusted for playing in the tough hitting park, placed him above the Max Dominant Factor for those categories, and was one of the best fielding outfielders in baseball, with good range and a good arm. All in all, Orator Shaffer had the best year of all position players in the 1870s, at 50.240 PEVA rating score, which ranks #12 overall in baseball history. And all this for a player with 0 home runs.
TOP TEN YEARS - BATTING - 1870s
D/ARank Name First Year Team Lg HR RBI AVG Age PEVA-B
1 /12 Shaffer Orator 1878 IN1 NL 0 30 0.338 27 50.240
2 /19 Barnes Ross 1876 CHN NL 1 59 0.429 26 46.554
3 /25 Jones Charley 1879 BSN NL 9 62 0.315 29 44.728
4 /27 Hines Paul 1879 PRO NL 2 52 0.357 24 43.731
5 /34 Barnes Ross 1873 BS1 NA 2 62 0.425 23 42.762
6 /77 Hines Paul 1878 PRO NL 4 50 0.358 23 38.405
7 /110 White Deacon 1877 BSN NL 2 49 0.387 30 36.179
8 /125 McVey Cal 1875 BS1 NA 3 87 0.355 26 35.627
9 /137 White Deacon 1875 BS1 NA 1 60 0.367 28 35.065
10 /192 Barnes Ross 1871 BS1 NA 0 34 0.401 21 32.973
Code: D/A Rank - Decade/All-Time Rank
Age: Age at end of year
D/ARank Name First Year Team Lg HR RBI AVG Age PEVA-B
1 /12 Shaffer Orator 1878 IN1 NL 0 30 0.338 27 50.240
2 /19 Barnes Ross 1876 CHN NL 1 59 0.429 26 46.554
3 /25 Jones Charley 1879 BSN NL 9 62 0.315 29 44.728
4 /27 Hines Paul 1879 PRO NL 2 52 0.357 24 43.731
5 /34 Barnes Ross 1873 BS1 NA 2 62 0.425 23 42.762
6 /77 Hines Paul 1878 PRO NL 4 50 0.358 23 38.405
7 /110 White Deacon 1877 BSN NL 2 49 0.387 30 36.179
8 /125 McVey Cal 1875 BS1 NA 3 87 0.355 26 35.627
9 /137 White Deacon 1875 BS1 NA 1 60 0.367 28 35.065
10 /192 Barnes Ross 1871 BS1 NA 0 34 0.401 21 32.973
Code: D/A Rank - Decade/All-Time Rank
Age: Age at end of year
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
It's history, baseball style. Check out our new book, Baseball's Best @ 150. Makes a great gift for the baseball fan. Comprehensive...
-
February 6, 2009 - Well, it surely didn't take too long. Even before he could sign a contract, Ben Sheets has been put back on the shel...
-
Let's talk about those pitchers. Past the pitching durability stats (Games, Games Started, and Innings Pitched), two of the remaining f...
-
It's gonna be a surprise to most, but it's just as surprising to us that the subject has not been broached in the debate over Major ...